Better building handover

I am not going to start on building defects – that is a topic much maligned by the media at the moment (who are having a feeding frenzy on Mascot Towers after the Opal Tower hysteria died down).

Instead, I am making a list (which I intend to update over time) of some typical oversights I see from builder/developers in the handover of strata buildings to the strata manager and the owners corporation. When considered as part of the development process and during construction, all of these things are cost-effective or free. Some will be relevant for all buildings, where others will not.

We work with builders/developers closely to ensure that these matters are thought through, early in the piece.

Mailbox Locations – Put them in a central/secure area. Australia post permits and encourages this for multi-residential. The next wave to think about is parcel delivery and we are working on solutions for unstaffed buildings (without a full-time building manager/concierge).

Colour coded/secure letterboxes at nook apartments Wickham.

Cleaners Room – Does the location make sense? Is there adequate space in the room for storage? Space to wash a mop? Proper drainage?

Facade and Garden Access – If height access equipment is needed to access the facade/windows and certain gardens, anchor points should be installed. If these aren’t there at handover, there’s no ability for the OC to maintain and a new building starts to look terrible whilst the argument over who is to install them takes place.

Access control/keys – The ability to program access devices onsite or remotely is key (pun intended), along with ensuring that we know who receives what device (so these can be removed from the system down the track if a person has left the building/not returned the device, lost the device, etc). Restricted key systems are good in some ways (security and the ease of having specific keys cut down the track) and a burden in others (locked into a specific locksmith, delays in obtaining keys). I see key/access device technology changing in the near future with phone/voice/facial recognition becoming more common. Ideally, access control equipment and CCTV equipment is wired to a secure central location.

CCTV – The installation of cameras in the focal areas of a building is cost effective and incredibly important. At a minimum, the garage entrance, any foyer entrances, the mailboxes, and any common recreation areas should be covered. CCTV is a great deterrent to bad behaviour and a potential audit trail when things go wrong. Speak to my friends at Quorum Security.

Security control room at Hope Island. Hope Island is managed by Cambridge Management Services.

Keyboxes/Remote Access – How do contractors get onsite in the event of an emergency or when (if one is appointed) a building manager is not there? It’s vital to have a secure keybox onsite to get people into the building.

Internet – Nearly every building should have an internet connection! Programming devices offsite, remotely viewing CCTV footage, administering a digital display/noticeboard, shared internet connection for common areas, building management – these are some of the many reasons you would have the internet at a building.

Noticeboards – Ideally installed in a central area, such as the lift or car park. Down the back of the garbage room isn’t ideal.

This is how you do noticeboards for foyers (don’t mind the cords – this is just testing in the office).

Lift Curtains – If the building has a lift, lift curtains must be provided from the start to prevent damage (particularly with the huge influx of residents moving in the first few months).

Lift Cabling – It’s inordinately expensive to have a lift company run data cable to a lift for access control or CCTV once a lift is in-situ and operating. If it’s provisioned during the construction phase, it’s very inexpensive.

Moving Plans – What is the plan for residents to move in – times/days/how many at once, etc? You can administer this well through the use of BuildingLink

Signage and Communications – Whilst building operation may seem plainly obvious to a builder/developer, to many residents it may not be. Proper signage/instructions for contacts, moving, rubbish, etc is vital.

Bins – Speak with Council (or private waste provider if non-Council collection) as early as possible to ensure that bins arrive well before residents do.

Retail Lots – Where there are retail lots at a scheme a fit-out guide should be designed and relevant by-laws put in place. This protects the individual interests of the retail/residential owners.

2019 SCA National Conference – recap

It was an excellent Strata Community Association national conference in Auckland – I am still recovering from it (in a few senses) a week and a bit later, which is why the delay in posting.

Here’s my top 10 from the week

  1. Bright & Duggan winning the National Strata Manager of the Year award (along with Strata Data). Well deserved accolade, reflecting the hard work of Bright & Duggan and Cambridge, across the Eastern seaboard.
Bright & Duggan winning National Strata Manger of the year 2019 – Chris Duggan accepting the award.

2. Clare Stuart of Bright & Duggan QLD winning the SCA Community Manager of the Year – Rising Star award.

Congratulations also to Cambridge Victoria for their nominations for Strata Community Management Business of the Year – Small and Briana Edgecombe for her nomination for Support Team member of the Year.

Clare Stuart of Bright & Duggan Queensland winning the strata community manager of the year rising star

3. Sir Bob Parker presenting the keynote on providing reassurance in times of need. Very chilling videos and photos of the Christchurch earthquakes.

What Christchurch experienced during that time certainly gives context to how bad times can be, for factors completely beyond your control.

4. Tuesday night welcome event at the Auckland war memorial and an awesome dinner afterwards with colleagues at Baduzzi – must visit if in Auckland.

5. The Impact of Design and Development – Matt Davis from Davis and Davis Architects. Whilst the keynote was quite winded, it was incredibly interesting as I move professionally into wanting to understand how buildings function for the benefit of their occupants. Did you know that design is only 0.5% of the cost of a building’s lifecycle, and operating costs 85%?

6. Getting some exercise in with colleagues and commuting to and from the venue on a lime scooter – lots of fun. Must bring these to Newcastle!

7. Sustainability presentation from City of Sydney. I have been big on sustainability and efficiency for strata schemes for many years – the topic is now a very mature one and front of mind given the introduction of NABERS ratings in the residential space.

It’s less efficient to live in an apartment than a house, which should not be the case.

More green walls and solar please!

Check out this cool article I read yesterday about green walls.

8. Macquarie benchmarking data presentation. The data has been out for a few months but it was good to digest again to understand where we sit as a business versus competitors and where we should push towards.

Attracting, retaining and continually engaging great staff is key – what’s the point in growing a business if you can’t do those things?

Also interesting is the push towards diversified revenues. Strata management companies shouldn’t be in business if they’re only profitable due to disbursements and insurance commissions.

9. Sharing times and a few drinks with friends from NSW and interstate and meeting a number of other industry stakeholders.

10. Getting a better understanding of where we sit as a business versus the industry – Bright & Duggan is a great business (and this is now nationally recognised), but constantly reflects on the way it treats its staff and serves its clients. These two factors are far more key to profitability than bringing on new business or slashing costs.

See you in 2020 (maybe at Griffith too)!

Where’s my money honey – pt 2 – the Capital works fund

Formerly the sinking fund in the NSW Strata Schemes Management Act 1996, the Capital works fund (CWF) is a much better title for the fund from which capital works at a scheme must be paid from. The Capital Works fund is still called the sinking fund in the Community Lands Management Act and in other states.

Budgeted properly from day dot, a scheme should now have little need to raise a special levy for capital expenditure in future years.

The Act (S79) is clear on how a scheme is supposed to budget for its administrative and capital funds:

  1. Account properly for what funds are left in the respective fund at the end of the financial year
  2. Prepare a budget for the coming year’s expenditure:
  3. Assess the levies required to meet the obligations of each fund, taking into account any prior year surplus or deficit in either fund.

Despite the Act being clear as to what is required, adequate budgeting to the CWF is still rare. I put this down to several factors:

  • The 10 year plans being drafted were (and still are in some cases), not worth the paper they are printed on and the budgets inadequate when seemingly expected works arrived (painting, roof works, etc). These have improved across the board and despite being a very cheap report, are of real value when done well and implemented properly.
  • Owners and strata managers fail in their obligation to budget adequately, playing catch-up with special levies when works come about.
  • At brand new schemes, often the initial budget being put forward is inadequate and not based on a plan. This is easily overcome by ordering a plan once a scheme is registered, given there are not less than 2 months before the First AGM must be held.
  • Buildings have fallen into such disrepair due to mismanagement by the strata manager and owners corporation that the owners are overwhelmed and refuse to implement the work they are required to do as they don’t know where to start. This leads to a loss of values and potentially a compulsory appointment of a strata manager by NCAT.
  • Owners don’t know what adequate levies look like as they transpose their experience at one scheme to another, or have been led down a garden path by a developer/strata manager putting forward inadequate estimates (which despite being a breach of the 2015 Act, still happens routinely).

I am not going to go into any detail on types of expenditure that come from the capital works fund, as this relates to the building fabric (which is different at every scheme), however, these are generally the larger ticket items:

  • Painting
  • Roofing
  • Waterproofing
  • Guttering
  • Hydraulics
  • Fire equipment
  • Landscaping
  • Access control
  • Carpeting/tiling
  • Doors / windows

How do we fix these issues ongoing?

  • Get a quality 10-year plan (which must be updated every 5 years) from the likes of Solutions In Engineering – ask questions about the report, particularly for any work in the near future (maybe even obtain a quote to see if the external painting work in 3 years is a realistic cost).
  • Implement the plan – irrespective of what that means to a levy increase. If there is urgent work outstanding, perhaps draw a line in the sand and get the work done asap via a special levy or strata loan so that levies can be made lower once the work is done – e.g. a scheme has $100k in the CWF and has to do a $500k repaint in 6 months. Raise the money over years and the work becomes more expensive and more urgent due to resultant damage – get the work done asap to incur short term pain but restore value.
  • Educate/educate/educate – the CWF pays for the sexy stuff that helps a building look good down the track and compete with newer stock in the market. Owners should understand that putting $1.5k-$2.5k aside each year in this fund (in the case of a new scheme) protects their asset.

As a guide, a brand new scheme (apartments/townhouses) should set aside between $1.3k-$2k per lot per annum, depending on the nature of the building and its specific maintenance requirements.

2019 SCA National Conference – next week!

I can’t wait to head to Auckland next week for the Strata Community Association (SCA) national conference. It’s an action-packed week and a chance to reflect on what we’re doing well and what we can ‘be better’ at (Bright & Duggan’s new leading value).

I have been fortunate enough to attend the last two national conferences and I think this will be the best one yet – not least because it involves a trip over the ditch. I am very excited to be joined by my wife Kylie and daughter Thea, who will make their own fun whilst I am conferencing.

I am looking forward to:

  • Seeing and meeting a number of our interstate friends and business partners (along with more local ones I have barely seen since a move to the Hunter and starting a family).
  • Events at the Auckland War Memorial and the Viaduct.
  • Bright & Duggan NSW (or Cambridge Management Services QLD) winning the Large Strata Community Management Business of the Year award at the gala awards (high confidence – 2/5 chance!), along with three other awards our business/staff are in the running for.
  • Zipping around Auckland on a Lime Scooter.

The conference program is excellent and I’m picking the following sessions as the stars:

  • Macquarie strata Benchmarking report insights.
  • Panel – challenging times for strata managers (featuring our own Chris Duggan).
  • Panel – driving the building defects agenda. I believe that Bright & Duggan leads the market with our approach to defects, which seeks to bring the various parties together for non-litigated outcomes.
  • Providing reassurance during a time of need – presented by Sir Bob Parker, the mayor for Christchurch during the 2010 and 2011 earthquakes.
  • Why utility management is critical for strata managers – I am a big believer that data drives better decision making (or removes a need for decision making in some cases as it presents such a compelling argument). Also moderated by Mr C Duggan.
  • Panel – building a career in strata. I don’t believe (as an industry) that we do an amazing job at attracting and retaining people; concentrating on how we improve at this is vital to long term business success and recognition as a profession.
  • Panel – The right amount of business growth, moderated by our fearless leader Chris Duggan.
  • Keynote – The impact of design and development, presented by Matt Davis from Davis and Davis Architects

I am particularly interested in speaking to people about a blended strata/facility management approach (asset/governance/finances)- I believe this is where the market is going and it’s an area that Bright & Duggan/Cambridge Management Services will lead – particularly in the Hunter!

If you’re going – look forward to catching up there.

Stay tuned for a recap of the event after I catch my breath the week following.

Does a BC/OC/CA/neighbourhood have WHS obligations?

We are often asked whether a scheme (falling under the definition of bodies corporate – meaning it could be strata scheme, body corporate, community, neighbourhood, etc), has Work, Health and Safety Obligations.

In essence – no, not unless it is a commercial scheme or employing people directly (and thus falling under the definition of Person Conducting Business or Undertaking).

This is the section of the WHS Act with reference to bodies corporate being an exception (provided they don’t have employees).

https://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/legal-obligations/strata-title-and-body-corporate

Meaning of “person conducting a business or undertaking”—persons excluded
(1) For the purposes of section 5 (6) of the Act, a strata title body corporate that is responsible for any common areas used only for residential purposes may be taken not to be a person conducting a business or undertaking in relation to those premises.
(2) Subclause (1) does not apply if the strata title body corporate engages any worker as an employee.
(3) For the purposes of section 5 (6) of the Act, an incorporated association may be taken not to be a person conducting a business or undertaking if the incorporated association consists of a group of volunteers working together for 1 or more community purposes where:
(a) the incorporated association, either alone or jointly with any other similar incorporated association, does not employ any person to carry out work for the incorporated association, and
(b) none of the volunteers, whether alone or jointly with any other volunteers, employs any person to carry out work for the incorporated association.
(4) In this clause, strata title body corporate means an owners corporation constituted under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015.

Relevant articles are below on safety/WHS

https://www.makdap.com.au/publications/do-new-whs-laws-affect-your-strata

https://www.bannermans.com.au/strata/articles/strata/351-owners-corporation-s-duty-to-ensure-safety-of-the-common-property

Where’s my money, honey?

Pt 1 – the administrative fund

All strata owners pay strata levies. From the smallest to the largest scheme, the nature of strata is that something is shared between more than one owner and as a result, those owners need to meet their apportioned (unit entitlement or otherwise) share of costs.

The statute in NSW gives that each and every year, levies need to be established for the coming financial year ahead. See Part 5, Division 1 and 2 of the SSMA.

In NSW there are both administrative fund (operating fund – S73) and capital works fund (capital expenditure – S74).

The administrative fund should be budgeted to run to a small surplus or net nil each year; basically, the incomings should match the outgoings, give or take any accrual or deficit from the prior year. It’s not uncommon for an administrative fund to be in deficit at certain times of the year due to the fact that levies and expenses are not all straight-line – i.e. you collect levies over 4 quarters, many expenses you pay monthly, quarterly or annually (notably insurance); that said come the end of the year any deficit must be made up by way of normal levies or a special levy.

So often people either don’t understand or take the time to understand where their levies are going or may even be of the mind that their strata manager and service providers are conspiring to rip them off. In an effort to try and provide readers transparency around their strata fees (including that of the strata managing agent), I have sought to go into detail and provide you a fairly exhaustive list in the main types of expenditure  (and possible costs – noting these figures are incredibly general) you’re likely to encounter with a strata plan (the definitions remain the same for community, neighbourhood and Building Management Committee) .

I also note that brand new schemes are rarely exposed to full maintenance costs in the first year of operation. As a result, the initial levies will often be under-quoted in an effort to assist off-plan sales. I am an advocate for realistic levies from day dot – if money is collected in the first year and not spent, fantastic. It can be very hard to convey the need to raise levies to a group of owners at the best of times, and you don’t need to be doing so off an unrealistic budget in the first place.

Note – I have gone into detail on the costs where they are routine. The information provided is very general and should only be applied to your own costs in a rudimentary way – seek professional advice!

Figures current as at May 2019.

Administrative

Administration Costs

Strata Management (base management fee) – $250-$400 per lot, per annum depending on the size and complexity of the scheme and the calibre of the management company and manager (you get what you pay for). These are base administration costs and would generally cover secretarial (inbound and outbound correspondence), record keeping, basic/routine financial/accounting costs, arranging meetings, compliance, etc (disbursements and time charges may attach to these functions).

Strata Management (additional fees) – The base management fee includes a number of items (referred to under schedule A of  the NSW Strata Communities Association agreement), however there are a number of matters outside of the agreed fee which managers would generally charge for on an hourly basis (often referred to as “Schedule B fee”, including meeting attendance, work involved in disputes/defects/legal matters, repair and maintenance involvement (minor/major works), project management, fire and life safety works, tendering contracts and works, etc). Additional fees will depend on the amount of work at a building each year that attracts these fees, noting that when a building utilises professional services, they are paying for a professional’s time and unless some sort of all-inclusive arrangement has been negotiated upfront, a scheme will likely encounter these fees.

Taxation – every strata scheme must submit a tax return each year – $200-$300 per annum. If registered for GST ($150K+ revenue), a scheme must submit quarterly BAS statements. This may be done by the strata manager or by an external accountant. Suggest a budget of $300-$400 per quarter.

Legal Costs – Strata schemes are bound by a raft of legislation and it’s common that legal advice is sought and that lawyers are asked to prepare by-laws for a building. Budget anywhere between $500-$5k per annum depending on the size and nature of the scheme.

Defects advice and litigation is a different matter and I will not go into the costs of running claims against a builder/developer (expert and legal fees).

Disbursements – Disbursements generally are the agents, building managers or Strata Committee recouping their costs of printing, postage, record storage, software computer, phone, etc. Whilst in some cases these costs may seem vast (particularly at a large scheme), that is due to the fact that all owners must be sent levies and meeting notices/minutes/papers and commonly they will prefer a hard copy via mail or simply neglect to provide an email address for electronic correspondence. Budget up to $100 per lot per annum.

Software – Many schemes will utilise some sort of software in the management of the scheme, which may be controlled by the strata manager, the building manager or the committee. The software may be purchased outright (such as access control software allowing the programming of swipes onsite), or it may be a paid for by a subscription.

Building management software, such as BuildingLink is commonplace now and greatly assists in the management of a scheme when used effectively. BuildingLink is particularly good as it’s not proprietary to the building manager.

Insurance – Under S160 of the Act, an owners corporation is required to insure the building. This cost of insurance depends on value and risk factors. A scheme should obtain a valuation often and use the services of a broker. Insurance, depending on the risk may cost between $400 and $2K per lot and can fluctuate wildly year-on-year due to the wider market, government taxes, building materials/defects (e.g. cladding) and claims history.

Owners and occupants are advised that they should also take out contents or landlords policy.

Schemes should always outsource their claims and renewal to an insurance broker.

It is further noted that strata managers may receive an insurance commission, which leads to lower management fees and largely pays for their involvement in the claims and renewal process.

Strata Commissions update by Paul Keating of Strata Community Insurance

Facilities Services

Building Management (S66 SSMA) -Whilst a building manager (sometimes referred to as a caretaker, however, this is fairly dated terminology and a caretaker might otherwise be a glorified cleaner or a party under a caretaking contract) is not required by the Act, many large/premium schemes will have a full time manager and it is the case now that many smaller schemes (as small as 20 lots) will have a building manager in a part-time capacity.

The point of a building manager is having regular onsite inspections and professional contractor management. Your strata manager is generally not well equipped or cost-effective to conduct onsite inspections and whilst we manage contractors, it is done at a reporting and arms-length basis. The need for building management hours will depend on a number of factors, including the size of scheme, common facilities, hours and involvement of other service providers, rectification works, etc.

You should expect to pay around $145K incl GST for a professional (and there’s a gulf between professional operators and those that are not) full-time building manager and then as little as about $10-15K per annum for a manager than conducts routine inspections and manages their role offsite.

Many people have a view that the manager needs to be onsite for “x” hours per week. Good managers (especially part-time ones with only so many hours in their contract each week) should not need to be – their importance is attending quickly to issues as they arise, inspecting all common property regularly, overseeing contractors and proofing their payments and reporting regularly to the strata manager/committee. The use of technology and using the internet to enable remote management is key. Building managers should not be confused for concierge or security services.

Security / Concierge – Expect to pay around $40 per hour for security or concierge services. Remote patrols can be a cost-effective way of providing guards at larger sites.

Cleaning – Quality cleaning is vital – first impressions are everything at a building or community. Cleaning costs increase based on the size/complexity of the scheme (i.e. the number of corridors), rubbish disposal requirements and common facilities. A cleaner might only be required 1-2 x per week for an hour or a building/community might have multiple cleaners 7 days per week.

Cleaning costs often vary depending on how little the cleaner is being paid, unfortunately.

The real cost of employing a cleaner including profit and on-costs is c. $40-$50 per hour incl GST. A building should ensure that their cleaner is being paid according to the award. Unfortunately, many cleaners are the working poor, due to sub-contracting arrangements that can see them being paid as little as $15 per hour.

Gardening/Landscaping – Expect to pay $50 approx. per hour for landscaping/gardening/lawns. Like cleaning, landscaping is first impressions and should be done professionally.

Fire

Fire Maintenance – This is a major cost at many schemes, often for good reason. The majority of (managed) schemes (as the owner of the land) are required to submit an Annual Fire Safety Statement (AFSS) to both Council and the Fire Brigade. The AFSS lists the fire measures applicable to a building, including any alternative solutions and gives proof that they have been assessed as compliant or otherwise. Basically – a building will have fire measures, such as fire doors, sprinklers, diesel pumps, emergency lights, alarms, etc and these need to be tested as working.

The amount of fire equipment that needs to be assessed at a building can be vast, and when it’s expired or defective it needs to be fixed (which might be costs borne by the admin or capital fund).

Annual maintenance (testing) alone, can range from $500-$20K+, depending on what equipment is onsite and how often it must be tested.

Fire monitoring – Expect to pay c. $1500-$2K for the fire panel to be monitored (and there’s only so many companies that do this – Romteck being my preferred). These are generally now on a sim solution, so there’s no need for a separate telephone line cost.

Fire (AFSS Submission) – Cost of the agent submitting the AFSS. Up to around $300.

Lifts

Lift Maintenance – $4K-$10K per lift per annum, depending on the age of the lift, service history, number of levels serviced, inclusions in the contract, etc.

Often these contracts will continue to rollover and not be at ‘market rates’ as they haven’t been tested.

Given the amount of money involved in maintenance and the fact that lifts are vital equipment – I always suggest the involvement of lift consultants such as JCA and Equity Elevator Consultants to run a lift tender and provide an independent condition report on the lifts.

Lift Telephones -Lifts are required to have a telephone in them, which is connected to the monitoring centre for the lift company. These used to be fixed lines which costs c. $40 per lift per month, but are now generally a sim solution (due to the NBN), and could be up to $60 per month per lift (but you can generally reduce this – speak with a consultant such as those noted above).

Maintenance Items

Air-conditioning – Generally, split-system air-conditioning will be exclusive-use of the owner of the property. If there is a cooling tower or VRV system, this would generally mean some maintenance/electricity cost is borne by the owners corporation and some by the owner.

A cooling tower might cost $10K pa to maintain.

Pumps/Irrigation/On-site detention – I have placed these items together as they are all to do with reticulation and can often be serviced by the same contractor. Pumps are common and often they are not adequately maintained, which can be catastrophic. Hot water pumps, cold water pumps, irrigation pumps, storm-water pumps, etc.

Maintenance costs may range from $1K – $10K per annum depending on what equipment is onsite.

Access Control/Intercom – These panels are generally not expensive to maintain and might be checked each year by a security contractor. c. $500-$2K per annum; depending on how many panels. The real costs associated with this system come from capital replacement (handsets in all apartments) and the panels themselves.

CCTV – As per access control/intercom – not expensive to maintain once installed but will need to be replaced in time. These systems are now very cheap thanks to an influx of cheap but great Chinese product.

Contingency – Important on new buildings, as you can never be sure what might come up, which would constitute a running/admin cost and not a capital cost but is once-off.

Electrical – When buildings were less complex, it was pretty much fire, cleaning, electrical, gardening and lifts – now look at the list! In the administrative fund, these costs would be minor electrical repairs to equipment.

Electrical Lamps and Tubes – The bigger the building, the more lamps, and tubes that might need replacement. Thankfully, with LED technology, replacement is at longer junctures than what it once was. These are consumables, rather than capital costs.

Exhaust/Ventilation – Many buildings will have carpark ventilation and bathroom ventilation – the fans and CO system must be serviced. This might be as little as $1K annually or up to $15K annually in more complex buildings.

Garage Doors – Like lifts, a vital piece of machinery in a building given when it’s not operating you might not be able to leave the carpark or the door might be stuck open, creating security issues. Garage doors should be on the preventative maintenance schedule. Generally, this maintenance is quarterly and at its most basic would be about $200 per door per visit, not including any parts.

Garbage Compactor – If you have a garbage compactor onsite as part of your rubbish system, you want to ensure that it’s operating properly. Compactor servicing is around $2K per annum per compactor, depending on the manufacturer and the size/operation of the compactor.

Gym Equipment – Gym equipment is relatively inexpensive to service, perhaps $1K per annum for most small gyms you would find in a strata scheme. It is important to have equipment checked and serviced routinely, given that it can be a hazardous.

Hot Water equipment – If there is a centralised hot water system on site (generally this will be made up of electric or gas boilers and storage units), this will need to be maintained quarterly. Maintenance anywhere from $1K-$5K, depending on the type of system.

Locks/Keys – This is generally a repair budget for locks and also the purchase of keys by the owners corporation. Cost should be minimal.

Pest/Vermin control – Pest/vermin control costs will depend on the type of building (size, location, is it mixed-use with restaurants, etc). A few pest treatments a year at a small scheme for cockroaches and rodents in common areas might cost $200 per service. Extensive pest control at larger schemes with a retail/restaurant component could be $5K+ pa.

Pool (servicing/chemicals) – An outdoor pool is less expensive to maintain than an indoor pool, however, I estimate that a pool costs not less than about $8K per annum in servicing and chemicals and $15K+ if it’s a large pool/indoors. This isn’t factoring in gas/electricity usage or any repairs.

Plumbing and drainage – Plumbing and drainage costs are akin to electrical and will be minor repairs. This could be anywhere from $500 per annum to $10k+ per annum at larger schemes (it’s worth checking any larger costs allocated here that they are not better in the capital works fund).

Window/Facade Cleaning – Inaccessible windows and balcony glass/louvers at schemes should be cleaned on a routine basis. This may be quarterly, bi-annually or annually. Anchor points will also need to be certified. The cost will depend on the difficulty of the access and the number of elevations needing to be cleaned. The location of the building is also a factor – coastal buildings affected by salt should be cleaned more often. Costs may be less than $1K if the work can be done from the ground once annually, or $20K+ if it’s cleaning a full glass facade multiple times, annually from a BMU or rope access.

Utilities

Electricity – Electricity consumption in the common property may be a large ticket item if a building is large or inefficient. Fans and lighting generate a lot of electricity use.

It’s hard to give an estimate for use at a scheme, all I can suggest is constantly reviewing usage and whether there are measures that can be taken to reduce it (or generate your own with solar panels). I have worked with Ethan Burns at Sustainability Now extensively over the years and can’t recommend anyone more highly for an energy audit and with help implementing energy-saving initiatives.

Wattblock are also excellent for energy and water ratings/initiatives.

Like at your property, you should ensure that the common property is getting the best available rate in the market for electricity (on contract or otherwise). Either of the companies above can assist with this.

Water – Water usage for the whole building at older schemes in Sydney is generally borne by the owners corporation, whereas new schemes must have individual metering. Water usage costs can be huge at a building, particularly where there is landscaping, unknown leaks, etc. Water usage should be tracked as best as possible. As a rule of thumb, where water is not individually metered I used to budget $300-$500 per lot per annum into the budget.

Under Hunter Water, the situation is different. Whilst many schemes are built with sub-meters to apartments, Hunter Water will only read the single boundary meter – they then bill individual owners based on unit entitlement, meaning that the owners are paying a share of the common property bill and there’s no incentive for saving water on an individual basis. The individual meters can be read but paying a strata manager to do the billing outweighs any benefit of doing so.

In an ideal world all lots and the common property are individually (electronically) metered with the retailer and occupants can see their use in real time, and can be alerted when abnormal use is happening (which may indicate a leak).

Gas – Generally, there’s quite minimal common property gas use (unless there is a gas heated pool at the scheme or there’s a single gas meter for all lots at the scheme, which is the case for a building I am in in Pyrmont). Hot water is generally the only gas use otherwise, which in most cases is individually metered.

Rubbish Removal – Sometimes, a building will not have an agreement with council for waste pick-up and they thus need to have their own waste pick-ups. This is very expensive (hundreds, perhaps thousands per month) and owners of the building should be receiving a reduction in their rates to account for this.

It’s generally the case that cleaners will have a role in bin movement to/from the place that council collects the bins or Council will drive into an agreed area at the scheme to collect the bins.

New schemes will often have a build-up of packing waste that will need to be removed, so we will budget a few thousand dollars for this to take place.

Waste is one of the least appealing but most vital services at a building and should be looked at in depth by developers to ensure that the planned waste storage/removal method will not affect the building and residents negatively.

Developments changing the face of Newcastle

There’s a number of developments being planned or under construction in Newcastle, which will change the face of the city, along with where people live/work and play.

The Newcastle Apartment market is not as buoyant as it was in late 2017, however, it’s still one of the most exciting markets in Australia for a variety of reasons – relatively affordable pricing, amazing and improving amenity, solid rental yields, new transport links, and job growth. With the election now over, I see that interest in the market will be restored and growth will be spurned. Compared to Sydney and the other capital cities, the amount of stock available is minimal and some of the product is phenomenal for the money.

East End by Iris Capital

What is it – Multi stage mixed-use development on the Hunter St mall site by developer Iris Capital. Up to 550 apartments and c. 15,000sqm of retail. Hunter Street mall is a difficult site and has had a long history of problems and owners.

What’s the big deal? The scale of this project is huge for Newcastle and a testament to the owner’s vision and investment in the City.

I’m looking forward to the improved retail, dining and leisure precinct in the traditional heart of the city, especially the coming of the QT brand to Newcastle.

SKY Residences by GWH Build

What is it – Residential towers fronting King and Hunter streets. The building has resort facilities for residents which are rare for Sydney and not seen in Newcastle, including a large outdoor pool on the podium and a terrace overlooking the harbour on the top floor. The development is close to the new Civic light rail stop, Newcastle Uni NeW Space and Market town shopping precinct. Apartment options from 1 bedroom through to 4 bedroom Sky homes.

What’s the big deal? See above. GWH Build has a unique offering in the market with their vertical integration – not only are they builder and developer on this project, but they also own the quarry, make the concrete, cast the precast, fire the steel, make the windows and doors, install the precast/steel/windows and doors. This gives a level of control over the development process that few builders/developers have and thus an ability to deliver on or before time.

I’m looking forward to seeing how this changes the way people live in the city – being close to so much means that people might legitimately be able to get rid of a vehicle and be able to walk to work/uni/beach/entertainment. Hopefully, I have friends move in so I can experience the pool and the Sky lounge!

Stella and Eaton by Thirdi Group

What is it – Residential towers in Wickham, totalling close to 300 apartments. The sites on Union and Hannell Street abound the Thirdi Westend development, along with the Millhorn and Bishopsgate developments.

What’s the big deal? Wickham is the new western heart of the city, along with it’s Newcastle West neighbour. These developments are adjacent to the Newcastle interchange where you can hop on the train to Sydney or the light-rail to the East End and all that it offers (beaches, retail, dining, etc). Wickham has something special about it and it’s set to continue to improve once commercial and retail offerings complete. Eaton and Union each have great low-maintenance resident facilities – such as gyms and roof/podium gardens. The apartments have smart home technology and the buildings are designed for efficiency and to take advantage of the Harbour view.

I’m looking forward to watching these towers go up – my office is right next door!

Other Residential developments

Highpoint Charlestown by GWH Build

NBN Site – The Hill by Stronach Property

Bowline Wickham by Multipart Property

Huntington / Lume by Doma Group

Commercial developments

Darby Street Plaza by GWH Build

The Store by Doma Group

Gateway 2

Little National Hotel